| Monday, May 01, 2006 |
| Sniper Trial |
Can anybody out there explain to me why we are wasting thousands and thousands of dollars in tax payer's time and money to try a cold blooded killer who has already received the death penalty for the same crime in another state? Especially when he is not eligible for the death penalty here?
I don't get it. What will finding him guilty again prove? |
posted by Broadsheet @ 4:16 PM   |
|
| 7 Editorial Opinions: |
-
The right to a trial is as much for a victim as it is for a criminal, as well as a central tenet in the Bill of Rights.
-
I know - it was a rhetorical question for the most part, but when the outcome of a trial won't change anything - I'm not sure I see the point except to go through a ritual. Then again, perhaps it's the ritual that's important.
-
-
-
The publicity that the DA is going to get is pretty important too. Particularly if he has political aspirations.
-
tfg: If you drank, I'd accuse you of drunk blogging! Preview man, preview!
I'm not that desperate for comment tallies - but thanks for the boost.
-
LOL. Talking on the phone and commenting apparently don't mix.
|
| |
| << Home |
| |
|
|
The right to a trial is as much for a victim as it is for a criminal, as well as a central tenet in the Bill of Rights.